A Rose by Any Other Name Is Still Deadly, Disastrous Socialism – Twitchy


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Critique of Socialism

The article strongly criticizes socialism, arguing that its historical implementations have consistently resulted in violence, oppression, and economic ruin. It cites examples such as the Soviet Union under Stalin, Cambodia under Pol Pot, and China under Mao, emphasizing the high death tolls associated with these regimes.

Rebranding of Socialism

The author points out that socialists are attempting to rebrand their ideology to make it more palatable to the public, suggesting they are aware of the negative connotations associated with its history of violence.

Continued Violence and Justification

The article further claims that the left's persistent advocacy for socialism is evident in their willingness to condone political violence, citing a statistic that 55% of self-identified leftists believe violence, including assassinating political figures, is justified. The author connects this modern attitude to the violent legacies of past socialist dictatorships.

Conclusion

The article concludes with a call to reject socialism entirely, regardless of any attempts to rebrand or disguise it.

  • Historical Examples: Soviet Union, Cambodia, China, Venezuela
  • Key Argument: Socialism inevitably leads to violence and oppression.
  • Modern Relevance: The article connects past socialist atrocities to current political climate.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

One of the earliest news event memories I have is the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. I was six years old, and even then I understood the significance of the crumbling of that concrete. People in East Berlin were happy to rejoin the rest of Germany and be freed from the crushing boot of socialism.

Now that I'm older, I realize that was also a day that made Leftists very sad. Nearly four decades later, they still love their Karl Marx and won't let it go.

'True socialism hasn't been tried,' they argue as a defense of the horrors their ideology wrought.

How many times have we heard a Leftist say that, in an attempt to excuse the violent, oppressive, and impoverishing ideology that is socialism?

Far too many.

They will argue, with straight faces, that every socialist regime (and here, I lump in communism too) -- from Lenin and Stalin in Russia to Pol Pot in Cambodia to Mao in China and even Castro in Cuba -- simply got it wrong, and this time they'll get it right.

But only if they're in charge.

If that seems suspicious to you, good. It should.

Everywhere socialism has been tried, it has been two things: 1) actual socialism and 2) a bloody, deadly failure. 

Because socialism ignores the fundamentals of human nature. Namely, that people are motivated when they are rewarded (be it by money, freedom, praise, or something else). It pretends that if we all are equal -- that no one owns more, or works harder, or gets treated differently -- we will live in harmony. That is a facade and always has been.

Socialism is about ensconcing power in the hands of certain people, and then holding onto that power by repressing the rest of the people. We know this is true because that's the course that every socialist country has taken.

But the Left is nothing if not persistent. Despite the deaths and economic destruction, they keep coming back to socialism as their utopia endgame.

Even they admit they have a messaging problem, however. I guess a body count equivalent to one-third of the current population of America will damage a brand.

So they plan on calling socialism something else to hide its fetid, fascist history:

pic.twitter.com/KoDJIen4X3

— Power to the People ☭🕊 (@ProudSocialist) April 10, 2025

Having to rebrand your ideology to get people to buy it isn't the winning argument the Left thinks it is.

Let's call it "being kind and polite"

— idk I just work here (@windowinthevoid) April 10, 2025

Kind and polite? There is nothing kind and polite about socialism.

In the 20th century, that ideology killed northwards of 100 million people, whether by starvation, war, or government-sanction persecutions. It takes a special brand of ignorance to pretend that body count consists only of the bourgeois class; the majority of the dead are -- or, more accurately, were -- members of the proletariat the socialists pretend to love so much.

This is an old meme so I'm sure some of those numbers have gone up. pic.twitter.com/T3sQ8pb6wT

— Vin Tanner (@VinTanner417682) April 10, 2025

It undoubtedly has. 

Since the socialist takeover of Venezuela in 1999, it's estimated some 580,000 to 650,000 people have died, either from skyrocketing crime, protests, the collapse of the healthcare and food systems, and 'extrajudicial killings.'

In the Left's world, those people are just the sacrifices they're willing to make to advance their agenda. And that violence persists on the Left. Today, 55% of self-identified Leftists think political violence -- including assassinating President Trump -- is justified. They are the heirs of Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot. The same ideology that led those dictators to kill tens of millions of people still simmers on the Left.

That is what socialism was, is, and always will be.

And we must reject it wholesale, not matter what they call it.

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!