Barristers disciplined over ‘offensive, demeaning’ LGBTQI ‘joke’ posted in lifts


Two Australian barristers received reprimands and penalties for posting an offensive LGBTQI joke in their workplace, highlighting issues of professional conduct and inclusivity within the legal profession.
AI Summary available — skim the key points instantly. Show AI Generated Summary
Show AI Generated Summary
We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It

The tribunal said Squirrell had admitted to printing four copies of the letter at home and then posting them in the lifts on August 10, 2022.

Loading

The disparaging notes sparked widespread outrage in the legal community and led to investigations by the Victorian Bar and a highly controversial decision by IT provider Barrister’s Chambers Limited to search the email records of its client barristers.

The search discovered the email from Perry to Squirrell, according to the tribunal’s findings.

The investigation was eventually picked up by the Legal Services Board and Commissioner, which demanded answers from Perry and Squirrell.

Initially, Perry admitted to the Legal Services Board that he had sent the email but claimed the communication was private and intended “to poke fun rather than cause offence”, according to the VCAT findings.

Later, in a statutory declaration, Perry acknowledged the letter was offensive.

“Mr Perry clarified that he was the sole author and creator of the notice and stated that his motive was to poke fun at political correctness and wokeism rather than cast aspersions at minority groups,” the tribunal wrote.

Perry also denied knowing who posted the note in the lifts, and Squirrell has said Perry was not aware of what he did.

Perry and Squirrell both pleaded guilty to one charge of professional misconduct.

Loading

“The imputation of both deviancy and the unmeritorious receipt of briefs by barristers in the LGBTQI community is objectively offensive and demeaning,” the tribunal findings said.

“This conduct constitutes discreditable conduct which would reasonably be regarded as disgraceful or dishonourable by barristers of good repute and competency.

“The factual context of this charge is unique. It has the hallmarks of a university ‘prank’ were it not for the age of the protagonists and the offensive nature of the notice.”

VCAT reprimanded Perry and Squirrell and ordered they complete five “continuing professional development units”, donate $5000 each to the Fitzroy Legal Service Q+ Law program and pay costs of $2145 each.

Perry and Squirrell both declined to comment.

Neither has been subject to official disciplinary proceedings in the past.

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!