Bitter argument breaks out over controversial theory of consciousness | New Scientist
The Controversy Surrounding Integrated Information Theory (IIT)
A significant disagreement exists among scientists concerning Integrated Information Theory (IIT), a theory proposing that consciousness lies on a mathematical spectrum. Critics label IIT as pseudoscience with the potential for misuse in discussions about abortion and AI sentience. Conversely, proponents argue that critics are motivated by jealousy.
Competing Theories of Consciousness
Two primary theories, IIT and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), are currently vying for prominence in explaining consciousness.
Key Arguments and Details
- IIT posits a mathematical measure of consciousness.
- Opponents express concerns about IIT's potential for misapplication in ethical debates.
- Supporters defend IIT, suggesting that criticism stems from professional rivalry.
Supporters and detractors of a leading theory of how consciousness arises are stuck in an increasingly bitter debate. Opponents suggest that integrated information theory (IIT), which claims that consciousness can be defined on a mathematical spectrum, is pseudoscience that could be misused to influence sensitive debates around abortion and the sentience of artificial intelligences – while supporters say the detractors are just jealous.
Scientists have long sought to explain how the brain gives rise to conscious experience, but two prominent ideas have recently come to the fore: IIT and global neuronal workspace theory (GNWT).…
🧠 Pro Tip
Skip the extension — just come straight here.
We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.
Go To Paywall Unblock ToolSave articles to reading lists
and access them on any device
If you found this app useful,
Please consider supporting us.
Thank you!