Couple Who Defaced $400,000 Painting in South Korea Thought It Was a Public Art Project - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Summary of the Article

A couple mistakenly vandalized a $400,000 artwork by the graffiti artist JonOne at a Seoul shopping mall. Believing it to be a participatory art project, they added their own brushstrokes to the already paint-splattered canvas. The incident sparked a debate on social media in South Korea about art, authorship, and authenticity.

Key Details

  • The painting, titled "Untitled," is by American artist JonOne, known for his abstract street art style.
  • The artwork was displayed with paint cans and brushes, potentially leading to the couple's misunderstanding.
  • Organizers claim there were guidelines and a notice, but the couple disregarded them.
  • Social media users are divided, with some blaming the couple and others arguing the signage was unclear.

The incident transformed the artwork into a selfie hotspot, and the debate continues on the implications for art and its interpretation.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

SEOUL — The couple saw brushes and paint cans in front of a paint-splattered canvas at a gallery in a Seoul shopping mall. So they added a few brush strokes, assuming it was a participatory mural.

Not quite: The painting was a finished work by an American artist whose abstract aesthetic riffs on street art. The piece is worth more than $400,000, according to the organizers of the exhibition that featured the painting.

Now it’s hard to tell where the artist’s work ends and the vandalism begins. “Graffitied graffiti,” a local newspaper headline said last week.

Either way, the piece, “Untitled,” by John Andrew Perello, the graffiti artist known as JonOne, is now a magnet for selfies. And on social media, South Koreans are debating what the vandalism illustrates about art, authorship and authenticity.

The artwork is displayed with paint cans, brushes and shoes that the artist used when he worked on it, one of the exhibition’s organizers, Kang Wook, said in an interview. He added, “There were guidelines and a notice, but the couple did not pay attention.”

Some social media users have echoed Mr. Kang’s reasoning. Others say the sign was confusing and the couple should not be blamed.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device