Silicon Valley Is Coming for the Pentagon’s $1 Trillion Budget Silicon Valley Is Coming for the Pentagon’s $1 Trillion Budget Intel fordecisionmakingPalantirAndurilSaronicSaildroneShield AIHermeusEpirusSkydioReusablefighterjet thatblows updronesSecurehardwaredeviceWearablesAutonomousdroneHypersonic planeSystem thatzaps dronesBattlefielddataBattlefielddataCelltowerfeedsSatellitefeedsTitan In early March, the US Army received a prototype of the Titan, a mobile command post consisting of a large windowless container bolted onto a six-wheeled truck.The vehicle is so unassuming that it wouldn’t have looked out of place rumbling onto the shores of Normandy during World War II or through the Vietnamese jungle in the 1960s. But the station’s simplistic exterior belies the complexity hidden inside. Titan is packed with computer servers running software that gobbles up reams of information about troops, tanks and artillery in the field, integrates the data and links with satellite feeds from as far as Washington to keep tabs on the growing numbers of unmanned weapons crisscrossing the front lines. This intel is quickly distilled into usable bites, using AI to provide real-time assessments that streamline decision-making in increasingly complex combat theaters.Developed by lead contractor Palantir Technologies Inc., the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node, as the system is called in full, heralds nothing less than a revolution in how future wars are fought, and crucially: who will supply the gear to the modern soldier.The model of warfare put forward by Silicon Valley and increasingly embraced in Washington would recalibrate how assets are deployed on the battlefield. Instead of dozens or even hundreds of soldiers supporting one $100 million system, one soldier using AI software could command dozens of cheap, autonomous weapons, whether they’re airborne, in space, on land or in the sea.With just a series of clicks, soldiers will be capable of dispatching autonomous weapons, surveillance drones and other advanced equipment. This approach aims to deter enemy aggression by presenting an overwhelming force, and reducing risk by putting a protective shield around soldiers and expensive systems like fighter jets and battleships.Other key players in America’s high-tech defense push include Anduril Industries Inc., which is building combat drones and other autonomous weapons systems; Saronic Technologies Inc., a startup developing unmanned surface vessels; San Diego-based Shield AI, which is developing self-driving technology for aircraft and has been flying F-16s autonomously since 2022 (Bloomberg Beta has invested); and Los Angeles-based Epirus, which makes high-powered microwaves that can zap incoming enemy drones and swarms from the sky and disable boat motors. By Lizette ChapmanJulia JanickiTom FevrierAllyson Versprille May 8, 2025

The Titan is notable in other ways. It came in on time and within budget, according to Palantir, a rarity in US defense procurement. And while the $178 million contract accounts for just a tiny sliver of an annual Defense Department allotment targeted at $1 trillion in the coming cycle, it represents an important inflection point in a long but uneven collaboration between Silicon Valley and the Pentagon. The award, over a competing bid from RTX Corp., marked the first time a software company took the lead role on a battlefield system, making Palantir the first such prime contractor to emerge since General Dynamics Corp. more than 70 years ago.

Founded in 2003, Palantir has been providing intelligence software to the military for years. But the proposal for the Titan turned conventional wisdom on its head by putting software at the core of the system and wrapping the hardware around it, instead of the other way around. The company then partnered with Northrop Grumman Corp., L3Harris Technologies Inc., fellow Silicon Valley upstart Anduril and others to help produce the vehicle.

With the Pentagon pouring increasing resources into startups, tech founders and the venture capitalists backing them — many with strong ties to the administration of President Donald Trump — are on a mission to disrupt the defense industry dominated by a small number of so-called prime contractors.

“It’s not that we need to get rid of the primes — that’s idiot’s thinking,” said Steven Blank, a Stanford University professor who has long advocated for greater collaboration between Silicon Valley and the Defense Department. “We still need them, but we need a whole new generation of AI-based and new technologies too.”

For more than a decade, Palantir’s co-founder and chief executive officer, Alex Karp, has led an impassioned push for Silicon Valley to take on a bigger role in US defense contracting. Karp has embraced an unrestrained narrative, arguing that tech firms have a moral obligation to contribute to defense so Western democracies can prevail over their adversaries. And he’s blended his business savvy and intellectual gravitas (Karp holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from Frankfurt University in Germany) with Silicon-Valley hipsterdom: His carefully disheveled attire and mad-scientist locks have helped win him a cult following among a younger, predominantly male audience keen to see their heroes shake up the status quo — be it in politics or indeed a real-world battlefield.

Alex KarpPhotographer: Aaron M. Sprecher/Bloomberg

Karp argues that the AI-infused software capabilities being developed in the US can provide an insurmountable edge by harnessing the world’s best technology for the country’s defense. So-called intelligence nodes made by Palantir, for example, can be deployed near the front lines, shortening the time from identifying a target and engaging with it, and extending the range of weapons made by other firms. He and like-minded founders want to shake up a military-industrial complex they see as rigid and no longer able to innovate — a viewpoint also driving decisions made by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. In Karp’s view, America is ill-equipped to keep up with changes to warfare like the cheap, lethal drones that dominate the battle front in Ukraine.

Roiling the status quo isn’t a concern. It’s exactly the point: open competition can expose what isn’t working, while shuffling the power structure and making tech founders and their investors fabulously rich in the process.

“We love disruption,” Karp, who’s become a billionaire, said in February. “There’ll be ups and downs — there’s a revolution. Some people get their heads cut off.”

That survival-of-the-fittest ethos fits right into the way Palmer Luckey has approached his latest business, Anduril. After selling virtual-reality startup Oculus to Facebook, Luckey, 32, went on to co-found Anduril, which specializes in autonomous warfare. He wants nothing less than to create a challenger to Lockheed Martin Corp., the world’s largest defense contractor. In February, the company reached a deal with Microsoft Corp. to partly take over an up-to $20 billion Army contract to make augmented-vision goggles for soldiers. Luckey, who sports a flowing mullet, warns that China — already flexing its muscles in the South China Sea — is rapidly moving toward superior technologies, from hypersonic and self-guided missiles to drone swarms that can augment or someday replace manned fighter jets.

Palmer LuckeyPhotographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg

“We don’t have time for business as usual,” Luckey told Bloomberg Television in January, after announcing Anduril’s decision to build a $1 billion factory in Ohio to make weapons including aerial and maritime drones that use its AI-powered Lattice software. The platform was selected by the US Space Force last year for surveillance networks, and Andruil has also been working with OpenAI to bolster defense systems protecting soldiers from drone attacks.

Donald Trump’s return to the White House has given fresh momentum to the Defense Department’s push to adopt new weaponry and broaden its supplier list, supported in no small part by Musk’s DOGE, which is upending how the government is run.

Musk himself publicly questioned the need for piloted fighter jets last year, calling such systems “obsolete in the age of drones.”

For the first time ever, the DoD no longer owns all the technology necessary to win a war. For the first time ever, the DoD no longer owns all the technology necessary to win a war. Stanford Professor Steven Blank

Members of Trump’s administration have promised to cast aside bureaucratic hurdles to change, giving upstarts an unprecedented chance to migrate from the periphery of defense contracting to its core.

“We shouldn’t be fearful of productive new technologies, in fact we should seek to dominate them,” Vice President JD Vance — who as a venture capitalist invested in Anduril — told hundreds of tech founders at the American Dynamism conference hosted by venture firm Andreessen Horowitz in March. “That is certainly what this administration wants to accomplish.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said he’ll redirect 8% of nonlethal Defense Department spending, or about $50 billion, to new areas that include innovative weaponry and Trump’s Golden Dome missile defense shield. Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire co-founder of Cerberus Capital Management, has vowed to go line-by-line through procurement programs, with an eye to speeding the shift toward a “software-centric” approach to weapons acquisitions.

While controversies have raised doubts about Hegseth’s longevity in his post, the administration’s ambitions dovetail with growing support within Washington’s military and defense-planning circles for finding better ways to innovate. The effort began in earnest in 2015, when Defense Secretary Ashton Carter made a pilgrimage to Silicon Valley to foster greater collaboration with technology firms. He started the Defense Innovation Unit, the military’s flagship program to speed the adoption of advanced technology, which led to other military programs to address the branches’ critical, unmet technology needs. Both Republicans and Democrats have voiced support for such changes. “To draw entrepreneurship and technology back into defense, we must start buying advanced systems from the best talent that exists today,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker wrote in December as he proposed an overhaul of the Pentagon’s entire system for buying weapons.

Anduril’s headquarters in Costa Mesa, California. Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg

Military leaders have also promised to cut out bureaucratic layers standing in the way of new entrants: The Army, for example, has done away with lists of specific bid requirements for new systems, instead providing a brief outline of the capabilities it needs, according to General James Rainey, who heads the Army Futures Command.

In early March, Air Force Chief of Staff David Allvin announced that two “loyal wingman” combat drones, one being developed by Anduril and the other by defense contractor General Atomics, would be given fighter designations, a symbolic move that’s “telling the world we are leaning into a new chapter of aerial warfare,” he said at a defense gathering in Colorado. “It means collaborative combat aircraft. It means human-machine teaming. We’re developing those capabilities thinking mission first.”

Anduril is one of the key defense startups aiming to do just that, manufacturing a lengthening list of weapons, wearables, surveillance systems and other hardware all tied together by Lattice.

Anduril and General Atomics beat out Northrop, Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin for the drone contracts, which were issued under former President Joe Biden in 2024. Collaborative combat aircraft, or CCAs, are designed to fly alongside the Next Generation Air Dominance fighters that won’t be built for years, but also existing ones like Lockheed’s F-35. In contested skies, they would provide a protective buffer around the manned fighter, augmenting its reach with lower-cost drones that won’t have troops aboard put at risk. Prototypes are expected to be ready to fly this summer, Allvin said in March. (Later that month, Boeing was awarded the contract to build the next stealth fighter jet, dubbed the F-47, easing trad-defense concerns the president would turn away from manned warplanes altogether.)

Pentagon officials didn’t respond to repeated requests for specifics on its evolving plans.

Anduril, meanwhile, is preparing to raise at least $2.5 billion to fund its ambitions, in a deal that would double its valuation to more than $30 billion since it last raised capital in August.

Venture Capitalists Are Pouring Money Into Defense Startups

Sources: PitchBook; Bloomberg News * Anduril valuation based on Bloomberg reporting of funding round in progress.Note: While these startups focus on defense, some may operate in additional segments. Bloomberg Beta is an investor in Shield AI.

Broad change is afoot within the Defense Department. In April, Trump signed an executive order aimed at increasing the use of commercially available products, speeding procurement and bolstering the defense industrial base — a move that, along with one targeting maritime investments, is seen as benefiting startups. At the same time, the Pentagon plans to cull between 50,000 and 60,000 civilian workers, primarily to shift more money toward war readiness. While creating budget space, the loss of experienced personnel is likely to add to the formidable challenge of transforming the Pentagon over a short period of time.

Skeptics wonder how well the new stuff actually works, compared with battle-proven kit that’s been deployed and improved for years. Skydio, for example, had to go back to the drawing board after its attack drones, built for the Army and shipped to Ukraine by the thousands, proved vulnerable to Russian anti-drone radio jamming. There are also concerns about software companies’ ability to manage weapons production at scale, the ability to build a home-grown supply chain free of Chinese components, and how the new players will coexist with legacy primes.

A US Marine Corps officer prepares to launch a Skydio X2D drone during training alongside Philippine Marines on Balabac Island, Philippines on April 26, 2024. Source: US Marines/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock

Still, it’s imperative to reform the military’s acquisition and budget processes to gain access to new technologies, or risk falling further behind China, said Bill Greenwalt, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on defense issues. “Speed is now of the essence,” he said. To keep pace with other countries, “we have to take on some risk.”

Traditional defense contractors aren’t willing to just cede ground to nimble upstarts. In fact, they’ve paid close attention, looking to harness the new entrants’ advances — and the money flows — and avoid being ambushed. More than $7.1 billion in venture capital has been raised by defense-related US startups since the start of 2023, according to PitchBook, more than the prior nine years combined.

VCs Placing Bigger Bets on More Defense Tech Startups

Number of deals and total venture-capital funding to US-based defense tech startups

Source: PitchBook

Meanwhile, public investors have bestowed on Palantir a market cap greater than the most valuable prime, RTX.

Rather than stonewalling to defend their turf, traditional military suppliers have often formed partnerships with tech companies to integrate the technology into their products, sometimes acquiring startups to blend old and new capabilities.

“The primes have recognized that they have to treat this moment as an opportunity,” said Katherine Boyle, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz who co-leads its American Dynamism practice. “It’s a massive R&D subsidy coming through venture capital.”

Given a preference for “co-opetition” among both Silicon Valley and traditional defense firms – where they partner on one project and compete on another – the two camps have been striking a range of deals. Palantir, through its “Operation Warp Speed” program, is selling its software to traditional companies like L3Harris and startups including Saildrone (wind-powered uncrewed vessels that collect and process data), Anduril and Saronic, as well as publicly held Red Cat Holdings Inc. (airborne armed and reconnaissance drones), so they can improve their manufacturing processes.

“The reindustrialization of America is happening in our software,” Palantir’s Karp said in an interview this week after reporting quarterly results.

A Saildrone Explorer unmanned surface vessel operating in the Arabian Gulf. Source: US Navy/ZUMA Press Wire Service/Shutterstock Editorial

Lockheed Martin has active contracts with about one-third of the 130 or so startups it’s backed across space, propulsion, AI, quantum technology (which can be used in navigation, detection, logistics and encryption), hypersonic systems and other areas. It acquired its first portfolio company, Terran Orbitel, for its space business last year.

“The nation needs to buy the best capability, whether it comes from a Lockheed or another prime or from a startup company,” said Chris Moran, who leads startup investing for Lockheed Martin Ventures. The goal is to augment its capabilities in fast-moving areas where Lockheed may not be focused, “but certainly recognize that we need.”

Defense Tech Firms Gain Traction But Still Dwarfed by Established Contractors

US Department of Defense spending with the largest legacy defense contractors and defense tech firms in 2024

Source: Bloomberg Government Note: Other firms displayed include: Saronic with $7.2M, Skydio $6M and Red CAT $5.8M.

Collaboration between Silicon Valley and the Defense Department dates back at least to World War II, when US and British bombers were equipped with sensing equipment to detect and disrupt German radar installations. Those ties began to fray as the Cold War gave way to the Internet age. While US tech founders turned toward commercial opportunities, the defense sector condensed and lost vitality. The more than 50 major defense contractors that existed in 1993 has narrowed to just a handful today — Lockheed, RTX (formerly Raytheon), Northrop, Boeing, General Dynamics and L3Harris. One byproduct of consolidation has been a dearth of innovation and gaps in the US arsenal, according to Stanford professor Blank.

“For the first time ever, the DoD no longer owns all the technology necessary to win a war,” he said.

Musk’s SpaceX helped paved the way for the current crop of tech-defense startups that are resurrecting ties with the Pentagon. It famously sued the Air Force in 2014 for the right to bid on satellite-launch contracts; in 2016, Palantir filed a similar lawsuit against the Army. Their gate-crashing raised confidence among VCs of the profit potential in defense. The DoD’s innovation unit expanded to Boston and Austin in 2016, and has continued adding hubs to increase outreach to founders in robotics, AI, autonomy and other critical areas.

One major question mark on the road to dominating the next era of warfare is the Pentagon itself, long criticized for bloated budgets and a complex, slow-moving acquisition system that scares off all but a few experienced contractors. Even when it is willing to widen its circle of suppliers, the DoD struggles with a lack of coordination and duplicate efforts that waste resources. A Feb. 27 report from the Government Accountability Office said the DIU, for example, had failed to establish and measure its progress toward clear goals.

“I expect this to be an area where the DOGE will really dig over the next couple years,” said Betsy Cooper, director of the Aspen Policy Academy. “Whether they break some of the systems that have kept the primes in place for so long is something we’ll have to watch.” One way to become more agile, according to American Enterprise Institute’s Greenwalt, is to move away from big, single-source contracts that last years to awarding several companies smaller amounts and allowing them to compete. That way, the Defense Department will have more flexibility to kill a program early if the technology doesn’t pan out. “The biggest risk is embarking on something too big before you’ve demonstrated operational capability,” he said.

We shouldn’t be fearful of productive new technologies, in fact we should seek to dominate them. We shouldn’t be fearful of productive new technologies, in fact we should seek to dominate them. Vice President JD Vance

Another wild card lies with the founders and investors behind the growing army of defense startups, many holding deep ties to Trump’s world. Beyond Musk, there’s Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel — also a major investor in Anduril and SpaceX. He has long supported the president and backed Vance’s earlier Senate run in Ohio after employing him as a venture capitalist. Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale worked with Musk on the America's PAC that helped Trump win in 2024. He also is an investor in Anduril, Epirus and Saronic. Marc Andreessen rallied others in Silicon Valley to support Trump; his VC firm has invested in Shield AI, Skydio, Saronic and other upstarts.

Their clout isn’t unprecedented. During WWII, major industrialists like Henry Ford — initially a pacifist — played important roles in the national debate, said Michael O’Hanlon, director of research for foreign policy at the Brookings Institution. He worries, though, that some of today’s founders “aren’t aligned with the rest of us” and have tight relationships with President Trump. “By aligning with a controversial president, that could have undue influence and dominate foreign policy with their control of the market.”

A Ukrainian soldier installs the Starlink system near the Russian border. Photographer: Stanislav Krupar/laif/Redux

To get a glimpse of the dynamic, consider Ukraine. Spacex’s Starlink satellite network has been pivotal in keeping the smaller country in the fight against Russia. But the reliance on an individual like Musk has proven to have its drawbacks: His boast that Ukraine’s front lines would collapse if he pulled access to Starlink sent European allies into a panic, underscoring the importance of steady relationships with reliable partners when working with such balance-shifting weaponry.

This has given pause to some lawmakers like Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat who also sits on the Armed Services Committee. While she is eager for reform, she’s worried that giving someone like Musk such mammoth influence over the Defense Department’s purse strings will lead to just a different form of taxpayer abuse. “For decades, defense contractors have ripped off our military while producing equipment that costs too much and arrives too late,” Warren told Bloomberg. “It’s absurd to think that Elon Musk, a billionaire contractor himself, should police big defense companies when he is part of the problem.”

Edited by Anthony PalazzoMichael Ovaska Photo editing by Karolina Sekula With assistance from Courtney McBride