Georgetown County doesn't want a biomass plant, survey says


A community survey in Georgetown County, South Carolina reveals strong opposition to a proposed biomass plant, with residents favoring mixed-use development instead.
AI Summary available — skim the key points instantly. Show AI Generated Summary
Show AI Generated Summary

GEORGETOWN — Tom Swatzel, a former Georgetown County Council member, says the city is at a crossroads. 

It can redevelop the Liberty Steel and International Paper properties with mixed-use development and public access to the Georgetown waterfront — or once again fill the skies with smoke from heavy industry. 

The newly formed organization, Citizens for Georgetown, with Swatzel as its chairman, is advocating for the former.  

"In no way do we want to trade one smokestack for another," Swatzel said.

Citizens for Georgetown is a coalition of residents, business owners and community leaders, according to its website. Swatzel said he started the group when community members began asking for his help in advocating against heavy industry on the waterfront, including a biomass power plant proposed for the IP property. 

Swatzel was previously involved in redeveloping the Murrells Inlet MarshWalk.

This week, Citizens for Georgetown commissioned a community survey to gauge resident opinions on the redevelopment of the Liberty Steel and IP properties. 

It sent a survey to 1,300 Georgetown voters, and 352 people responded, Swatzel said.

The survey asked residents if they would support a biomass plant and if they would like to see mixed-use development with clean industry on the waterfront instead of heavy industry.

Roughly 70 percent of participants said they would oppose a biomass plant and about 20 percent of people said they would support it. A little over 10 percent said they were unsure, and one person skipped the question, according to survey results.

State Sen. Stephen Goldfinch, R-Murrells Inlet, has said he expects a biomass plant deal to be finalized in the next three to six months. He's argued the plant makes more sense than mixed-use development because the property has housed heavy industry for nearly 90 years and is likely contaminated. 

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!