Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Summary of "Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes"

This article reviews Jason L. Riley's book, "The Affirmative Action Myth: Why Blacks Don’t Need Racial Preferences to Succeed." The book argues that affirmative action has not benefited Black Americans and questions its necessity. Riley contends that its persistence stems from a desire to protect a narrative, rather than solve the problem of racial inequality.

Key Arguments

Riley's analysis is structured around five key points:

  • A comparison of the condition of Black America before and after the implementation of affirmative action.
  • The negative stigma associated with racial preferences on Black students and professionals.
  • The importance of strengthening Black families as an alternative to affirmative action.
  • An examination of the arguments for reparations.
  • A critique of the use of misinformation to defend affirmative action.

The article concludes that Riley's work provides a critical analysis of the distortions within America's racial discourse surrounding affirmative action.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

A review of The Affirmative Action Myth: Why Blacks Don’t Need Racial Preferences to Succeed by Jason L. Riley, 288 pages, Basic Books (May 2025)

Jason L. Riley’s important new book is a welcome contribution to a politically fraught debate. The Affirmative Action Myth: Why Blacks Don’t Need Racial Preferences to Succeed offers a frank reassessment of a controversial policy and asks searching questions about the reasons for its failure. Blacks have become the presumptive avatar of America’s downtrodden and oppressed—they are typically the country’s least successful demographic according to a variety of metrics, from academic achievement to socio-economic status. But as Riley notes in the book’s introduction:

The relevant question is to what extent does past or current racism, in whatever form it takes, explain ongoing racial disparities, and to what extent are racial differences in outcome being driven primarily by other factors that don’t get nearly the amount of attention that racial-bias explanations have received.

Riley maintains that affirmative action has failed to benefit blacks. But as the subtitle of his book indicates, he is not even convinced that it was ever necessary in the first place. It persists today even so, he argues, because its advocates are more interested in defending a narrative than they are in solving a problem.

Riley’s case against affirmative action is broken into five parts: the condition of black America before and after affirmative action; the stigma placed on black students and professionals by racial preferences; the importance of rebuilding the black family as a preemptive alternative to affirmative action; the problem with the case for reparations; and the tactical use of falsehoods to defend what most people now accept is an indefensible policy. The upshot is a work that offers a bracing overview of the distortions still plaguing America’s racial discourse.

This article is for paying subscribers only. Subscribe now Already have an account? Sign in

đź§  Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!