Hoy por hoy: Una amenaza a la separación de poderes del 14 de abril de 2025 | La Prensa Panamá


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Concerns

A proposed law in Panama's National Assembly is causing widespread alarm, as it's seen as a direct attack on the independence of the Judicial Branch and the separation of powers. The bill seeks to benefit two former presidents, one convicted and another accused of high-profile corruption cases.

Opposition and Concerns

The initiative faces strong opposition from various sectors, including the Catholic Church, the Chamber of Commerce, the ruling PRD party, and the Vamos coalition. This broad-based rejection highlights the gravity of the situation.

Concerns about Weakening Institutions

The article expresses deep concern about the potential for weakening democratic institutions. The authors question the motives behind the bill, suggesting it's driven by self-interest rather than legitimate governance. The lack of transparency, with some deputies refusing to state their positions, is condemned as cowardly.

Consequences

The potential long-term consequences of allowing such a bill to pass are emphasized, including the possibility of future attacks on the Executive branch and a broader erosion of the rule of law. The author warns that silence or complicity could have lasting negative effects for generations.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google
We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It

Panamá atraviesa una encrucijada institucional. Cuando la Iglesia católica, la Cámara de Comercio, el Partido Revolucionario Democrático (PRD) y la Coalición Vamos coinciden en rechazar una iniciativa de la Asamblea Nacional, el país debe encender las alarmas. Algunos diputados evaden adelantar si apoyarán o no un proyecto de ley abiertamente inconstitucional, cuyo objetivo es claro: favorecer a dos expresidentes: uno condenado y otro acusado en casos de alto perfil por corrupción.

Este no es un simple exceso legislativo. El proyecto golpea directamente las facultades del Órgano Judicial, vulnerando la separación de poderes que sostiene nuestra democracia. Si se permite este atropello, ¿qué sigue después? ¿Un intento de golpe al Ejecutivo?

La negativa a sustentar públicamente el voto no es prudencia ni estrategia política: es cobardía. El país tiene derecho a saber quiénes están dispuestos a debilitar las instituciones para proteger intereses personales.

Este no es un simple proyecto de ley: es una amenaza directa al Estado de derecho. Y el silencio —o la complicidad— en este momento puede tener consecuencias que lamentaremos por generaciones.

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!