Hoy por hoy: ¿Y si la mayoría se equivoca? del 18 de abril de 2025 | La Prensa Panamá


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Summary of the Article

The article uses the biblical story of Pontius Pilate offering the crowd a choice between freeing Jesus or Barabbas as a starting point to discuss the fallibility of majority rule in matters of justice. It argues that throughout history, popular opinion has often led to unjust outcomes such as wars and persecutions. In today's polarized world, where viral trends often outweigh truth, blindly trusting the collective voice poses a significant risk. The author stresses that justice shouldn't be determined by popularity contests or political calculations, but rather by upholding principles, guarantees, and a willingness to oppose popular sentiment even if it means going against the majority.

The core argument is that while the majority may hold sway in many decisions, justice requires a more nuanced and principled approach. The example of Barabbas, a criminal preferred by the crowd over the innocent Jesus, serves as a cautionary tale illustrating the dangers of allowing popular opinion to dictate judgments.

Key takeaways:

  • Majority rule is not always synonymous with justice.
  • Blindly following popular opinion can lead to unjust outcomes.
  • Justice demands adherence to principles, safeguards, and a commitment to acting justly, even if unpopular.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Según el relato cristiano, Poncio Pilatos ofreció al pueblo elegir entre liberar a Jesús de Nazaret o a Barrabás, un delincuente. Eligieron a Barrabás. Más allá de la dimensión religiosa, esta escena —real o simbólica— plantea una pregunta inquietante: ¿puede la justicia delegarse al juicio de las mayorías?

La historia, no solo la bíblica, está llena de decisiones injustas tomadas por clamor popular. Las mayorías han pedido guerras, aplaudido persecuciones y vitoreado sentencias infames. En un mundo polarizado, donde lo viral pesa más que lo verdadero, confiar ciegamente en la voz colectiva puede ser un riesgo.

La justicia no debe ser un espectáculo ni una encuesta. No puede depender del volumen de la indignación ni del cálculo político. Requiere principios, garantías y el valor de ir contra la corriente. Jesús representa al inocente, y Barrabás al culpable favorecido por la mayoría. La lección sigue vigente: en materia de justicia, no siempre la mayoría tiene la razón. Y cuando se equivoca, el daño puede ser irreparable.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It
Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device