Offensive tweet about Alex Greenwich set to cost Mark Latham more than $500,000


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Defamation Case

Mark Latham, former NSW One Nation leader, will pay over $500,000 in legal costs due to a defamatory tweet targeting Alex Greenwich, a Sydney MP. The Federal Court initially awarded Greenwich $140,000 in damages for the offensive tweet, described as a 'vile, homophobic attack'.

Legal Costs Dispute

A protracted legal battle ensued over the costs, with Latham arguing for a reduced payment. Latham's legal team claimed he should only pay a quarter of Greenwich's costs, but the court rejected this, citing Latham's overwhelming failure in the case.

Court Decision

Justice O’Callaghan ordered Latham to pay approximately 70% of Greenwich’s legal costs, totaling over $600,000. While some of Latham's subsequent comments were deemed not defamatory, his main claim was unsuccessful.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google
We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It

Former NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham is on the hook for an estimated half a million dollars in legal costs over a defamatory tweet about Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.

In a decision last year, the Federal Court awarded Greenwich $140,000 in damages over a highly graphic and offensive comment posted on Twitter, now X, in March 2023.

Sydney MP Alex Greenwich (left) and Mark Latham.Credit: Dominic Lorrimer

Greenwich’s barrister, Dr Matt Collins, KC, told the court that the tweet, which described sexual activity in graphic and offensive terms that The Sydney Morning Herald has chosen not to publish, was a “vile, homophobic attack” on the openly gay Greenwich.

Federal Court Justice David O’Callaghan on Friday ordered Latham to pay Greenwich’s legal costs of the defamation case on the ordinary basis, which results in the successful party recouping about 70 per cent of their bills. The Sydney MP’s costs have been estimated at more than $600,000.

The parties had engaged in a protracted legal fight over costs following the judgment last year, as Latham resisted paying the bulk of Greenwich’s costs.

Latham’s legal team had submitted he should be ordered to pay only one quarter of Greenwich’s costs on a party-party basis because Greenwich had not succeeded in every part of his case.

O’Callaghan found Latham’s subsequent comments to The Daily Telegraph, which were also part of the lawsuit, did not convey the defamatory meanings Greenwich alleged.

But Collins submitted that “Mr Latham overwhelmingly failed in this case” and he was “not the three-quarters winner”.

O’Callaghan said Collins’ submissions “are irresistible, and they must be accepted”.

đź§  Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!