Opinion | How Anti-Woke Ideology Transformed My College - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Impact of Anti-Woke Ideology on a Florida College

This opinion piece details the significant changes in a Florida college since the implementation of anti-woke policies by Governor Ron DeSantis. Professors now self-censor, avoiding terms like "racism" and "intersectional," fearing repercussions. The author warns that similar policies under a Trump administration could worsen the situation nationwide, citing Trump's admiration for Florida's approach and his threats to defund colleges deemed "woke."

Suppression of Open Discussion

The article highlights the chilling effect on open discussions. Previously, professors and students could engage in complex conversations, such as discussions on catcalling and its impact, without fear. Now, such discussions risk violating laws prohibiting teaching concepts of male guilt for the actions of other men. The climate of fear leads to self-censorship, both on and off campus.

Examples of Self-Censorship

Specific instances of self-censorship are cited: a professor stopped assigning an article on lynching and white evangelicalism to avoid potential scrutiny, and another professor censored her language even on personal social media. This self-censorship stifles open discussions and prevents students from developing their own views.

Concerns about Nationwide Implications

The author expresses strong concerns about the potential spread of these policies nationwide under a Trump administration. The piece serves as a cautionary tale of the consequences of such policies on academic freedom and open discourse in higher education.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

In the three years since Ron DeSantis set out to rid Florida’s universities of woke ideology, my campus changed significantly. Professors suddenly worried about what they could say and teach. Some started avoiding terms like “racism.” One student recently told me that when someone used “intersectional” in class, the instructor told her not to use that word.

Soon this could be the case in schools across the country. We’ve all heard stories of elite institutions cowering before President Trump’s assault on higher education. Take it from someone who knows: It could get worse — far worse.

Mr. Trump has been watching what’s transpired in Florida. The architect of Project 2025’s education policies has said that Florida is “leading the way” on university overhauls. Already, Mr. Trump has threatened to pull funding from colleges that don’t purge language he considers woke. He’s demanded new oversight of certain regional studies departments. Next he could try to ban, as Florida has, “political or social activism.” He could weaken the protections provided by tenure and faculty unions. I saw this happen on my campus, and I know the toll it took. If the Trump administration has its way, my experience could offer a preview of what’s coming for other universities.

Before Mr. DeSantis began targeting higher education, Florida faculty members could be confident that the administrators supported our professional judgments about how to teach our students. We had open, complex discussions without fearing for our careers. In a conversation in one of my classes, female students expressed the fear that catcalling provoked, and their male peers responded thoughtfully, reflecting on their own behavior — a learning experience for everyone. Today that conversation would, I fear, violate a Florida law that prohibits teaching male students that they must feel guilt for the actions of other men.

Since Mr. DeSantis’s crackdown, I’ve seen my colleagues harassed and investigated for addressing topical issues, even outside the classroom. The climate of fear gives the government precisely the result it wants. Administrators and faculty members alike practice anticipatory obedience to avoid even the appearance of wokeness, stifling the sort of open and civil discussions that lead students to develop their own views.

One colleague told me that he stopped assigning an article about lynching and white evangelicalism for fear that those terms could raise red flags. Another said she was censoring her language not just in class and on campus but also on personal social media.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device