The author contends that the Israeli protests against Benjamin Netanyahu's government, while framed as a defense of democracy, are primarily aimed at preserving a system that has historically disadvantaged Palestinians. The movement, according to the article, is not about achieving equal rights for all, but rather about maintaining the status quo which benefits Jewish Israelis.
The article criticizes the limited Palestinian participation in the protests, highlighting statements by Palestinian politicians who view the demonstrations as unrelated to the core issues of justice and equality for all residents of the region. The author argues that the focus on preserving a “Jewish and democratic state” is inherently contradictory, implying that a true democracy cannot exist where one group holds disproportionate power.
The article points to the absence of Palestinian concerns in statements by leading figures in the protests, such as Yair Lapid's lengthy essay which notably omitted the word "Palestinian." This illustrates the limited scope of the protest movement, primarily concerned with the preservation of power structures beneficial to Jewish Israelis.
The piece concludes that the struggle against Netanyahu is not a universal fight for democracy but a specific effort to save the existing political order that hasn't addressed the issues of Palestinian rights and equality. The author suggests that the concept of a "Jewish and democratic state" is fundamentally contradictory in a region where Jews make up only half of the population.
The warnings come every day: Israeli democracy is in danger.
Since Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government announced plans to undermine the independence of Israel’s Supreme Court, hundreds of thousands of Israelis have demonstrated in the streets. All of Israel’s living former attorneys general, in a joint statement, have warned that Mr. Netanyahu’s proposal imperils efforts to “preserve Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.” Liberal American Jewish leaders are cheering on the protests. Earlier this month, Alan Solow, the former head of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, said he and other American Jewish notables “share the concerns of tens of thousands of Israelis determined to protect their democracy.” In a public declaration, Mr. Solow and 168 other influential American Jews warned that “the new government’s direction mirrors anti-democratic trends that we see arising elsewhere.”
On the surface, the battle between Mr. Netanyahu and his critics does indeed look familiar. In recent years, from Brazil to Hungary to India to the United States, anti-government protesters have accused authoritarian-minded populists of threatening liberal democracy. But look closer at Israel’s political drama and you notice something striking: The people most threatened by Mr. Netanyahu’s authoritarianism aren’t part of the movement against it.
The demonstrations include very few Palestinians. In fact, Palestinian politicians have criticized them for having, in the words of former Knesset member Sami Abu Shehadeh, “nothing to do with the main problem in the region — justice and equality for all the people living here.”
The reason is that the movement against Mr. Netanyahu is not like the pro-democracy opposition movements in Turkey, India or Brazil — or the movement against Trumpism in the United States. It’s not a movement for equal rights. It’s a movement to preserve the political system that existed before Mr. Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition took power, which was not, for Palestinians, a genuine liberal democracy in the first place. It’s a movement to save liberal democracy for Jews.
The principle that Mr. Netanyahu’s liberal Zionist critics say he threatens — a Jewish and democratic state — is in reality a contradiction. Democracy means government by the people. Jewish statehood means government by Jews. In a country where Jews comprise only half of the people between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, the second imperative devours the first.
To understand just how illiberal the liberal Zionism championed by Mr. Netanyahu’s leading opponents is, consider the actions of Yair Lapid, his predecessor as prime minister. Last month, Mr. Lapid penned a nearly 2,000-word essay in which he wrote, “If this Netanyahu government does not fall, Israel will cease to be a liberal democracy.” It didn’t include the word “Palestinian.”
Skip the extension — just come straight here.
We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.
Go To Paywall Unblock Tool