Poetry's Data: Digital Humanities and the History of Prosody / AvaxHome


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Argument

Meredith Martin's Poetry's Data argues that literary studies must adapt to the technologically mediated landscape of research, acknowledging the influence of digital tools and data on our understanding of poetry.

Methodology

Martin's work involves building a database of historical prosodic materials, illustrating how digital humanities methods can be applied to literary scholarship. She uses the Princeton Prosody Archive as a case study.

Historical Context

The book traces how literature has understood poetry's data (its sounds) from the 16th century to the present, highlighting the historical context of digital knowledge infrastructures and the need for scholars to critically engage with current knowledge production methods.

Main Points

  • Traditional research methods are outdated in a technologically driven world.
  • Digital knowledge infrastructures have historical precedents.
  • The book emphasizes the importance of understanding mediation and format in the teaching of poetry and poetic form.
  • Five chapters and five examples from the Princeton Prosody Archive showcase the practical application of these ideas.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Poetry's Data: Digital Humanities and the History of Prosody by Meredith Martin English | April 22, 2025 | ISBN: 0691254664, 0691254672 | True EPUB | 224 pages | 17 MB

Why literary studies must confront digital mediation

We live and research in a technologically mediated landscape in which old models of reading and researching—methods that presume an autonomous, single scholar gathering resources and making claims—no longer hold. Scholars have yet to theorize either the embeddedness of their sources inside multiple layers of mediation or their own place in an information ecosystem that demands our active participation. In Poetry’s Data, Meredith Martin explores what current access to data might mean for mapping the discourse of poems. Martin’s account of her work learning about digital humanities so that she could build a database of historic prosodic materials becomes a through line in a narrative that chronicles how literature has understood poetry’s data—its sounds—from the sixteenth century to the present day.

Digital knowledge infrastructures have historical antecedents that scholars have been trained to theorize. And yet, as Martin points out, we have not been trained to identify and navigate, let alone critique, the current landscape of knowledge production. Through five chapters and five examples from the Princeton Prosody Archive, Martin shows that the histories of mediation and format are essential to the teaching of poetry and poetic form.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It
Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device