The article details numerous actions taken by the Trump administration that have been challenged as potentially violating existing laws. These actions include:
The administration's actions are seen as a direct challenge to the rule of law, with the potential for legal battles, given the existing Republican majority in the Supreme Court.
Other presidents have occasionally claimed a constitutional right to bypass particular laws. But in the opening weeks of his second term, President Trump and his administration have opened the throttle on blowing through apparent legal limits, often with no clear public explanation for how their actions could be consistent with the rule of law.
Already some of Mr. Trump's moves have prompted legal challenges, though the administration may be betting on rulings in its favor with a Republican-appointed Supreme Court supermajority.
Here are some examples of the administration’s defiance of statutes.
Ordered the Justice Department not to enforce a ban on TikTok for 75 days and to notify the app and its business partners that defying the law is no criminal offense.
Law barring TikTok from operating in the United States unless and until its Chinese owner sells it.
Required blanket temporary freeze on most foreign aid.
The longer it lasts, blocking congressionally approved spending comes into greater tension with Impoundment Control Act.
The Office of Management and Budget ordered agencies to carry out a blanket temporary freeze up to $3 trillion in domestic grants and other government spending.
The freeze has been temporarily blocked by two courts after plaintiffs raised challenges, including provisions in the Administrative Procedure Act and First Amendment rights.
Moved to apparently dismantle the agency and fold its functions into the State Department, including by making Secretary of State Marco Rubio its acting director.
A law in which Congress created U.S.A.I.D. and structured it as a stand-alone entity.
Summarily fired 17 inspectors general, the watchdog officials who hunt for waste, fraud, abuse and illegality in government agencies.
A law that says presidents have to give Congress 30 days’ notice and a written “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” before any such removal.
Summarily fired a Democratic member of the independent agency before her term was up, paralyzing the board by leaving it without a quorum.
A law that says presidents may only remove board members “upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause.”
Summarily fired prosecutors involved in the cases against President Trump or the Jan. 6 rioters.
Civil service job protections against arbitrarily firing federal workers without a good cause and without hearings before the Merit System Protection Board.
Declared that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment will no longer be interpreted as granting citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents or other visitors and instructed agencies not to issue citizenship-affirming documents, like Social Security cards, to such infants.
The longstanding understanding that the 14th Amendment does grant citizenship to such infants; a federal judge has barred agencies from obeying this order for now.
Skip the extension — just come straight here.
We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.
Go To Paywall Unblock Tool