Trump’s 'Big Beautiful Bill’ Already Hitting Senate Roadblocks as Congress Settles Into Vacation Mode | The New York Sun


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Senate Roadblocks for Trump's Spending Bill

Despite Speaker Johnson's efforts to keep the House-passed version of President Trump's "big beautiful bill" intact, Senate Republicans plan substantial revisions. Even Trump's allies express concerns.

Republican Senators' Opposition

Several Republican senators voiced strong objections. Senator Johnson called the spending levels "immoral" and "wrong" due to increased deficit spending. Senator Paul criticized the bill's insufficient spending cuts and inclusion of a debt limit hike, vowing to only consider it if the debt limit provision is removed.

Concerns and Potential Changes

Concerns extend beyond spending levels, including potential cuts to Medicaid. Senators Murkowski, Collins, Moran, and Hawley expressed opposition to cuts, emphasizing their states' reliance on Medicaid for rural healthcare. Modifications are likely before the bill can proceed.

Challenges and Timeline

The bill's passage is critical to avoid a debt default, with a potential deadline in mid-July. Republicans aim to avoid negotiations with Senator Schumer and will need to pass the bill before the deadline.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Despite Speaker Johnson’s pleas to leave the House-passed version of President Trump’s “big beautiful bill” intact, Senate Republicans seem ready to overhaul the legislation as conservatives and moderates alike have been sounding alarm bells. Even some of Mr. Trump’s closest allies in the Senate have said they cannot vote for the House bill as written. 

The House passed the bill by a margin of 215 to 214 early Thursday morning before lawmakers began their week-long Memorial Day recess. While it was a major achievement for Mr. Johnson, it was only the first salvo in what is sure to be a long battle. 

“I met with the Senate Republicans, all my colleagues over there last week … and I encouraged them, you know, to do their work, of course, as we all anticipate, but to make as few modifications to this package as possible,” Mr. Johnson told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday morning. 

“We’ve gotta pass it one more time to ratify their changes in the House, and I have a very delicate balance here — very delicate equilibrium,” the speaker added with a laugh, referring to his three-seat majority. “It’s best not to meddle with it too much.”

Republican senators don’t seem to care what the speaker has to say, however. 

On the same program Sunday, Senator Johnson said the spending levels in the bill were “immoral” and “wrong” because of the increased deficit spending included in it. 

“My campaign promise in 2010 and every campaign after that was to stop mortgaging our children’s future. It’s immoral, it’s wrong, it has to stop,” the upper chamber’s Mr. Johnson said. “I’m extremely worried about that. That is my primary goal [in] running for Congress.”

“This is our moment,” he added, calling on his colleagues to crack down on federal spending now rather than at some future unknown date. “This is our only chance to reset that to a reasonable pre-pandemic level of spending.”

Senator Paul, too, says that he cannot vote for the legislation in its current form, not only because of the cuts to spending levels — which he calls wimpy” and “anaemic” — but because of the inclusion of a debt limit hike in the reconciliation package. 

In order to deal with raising the debt limit on a party-line vote and bypass any negotiations with Senator Schumer, Republicans will have to pass the bill before the “X-date” of default, which Treasury Secretary Bessent says will come sometime in mid-July. 

“There’s gotta be someone left in Washington who thinks debt is wrong, deficits are wrong, and wants to go in the other direction,” Mr. Paul said on “Fox News Sunday” about his objections to the House legislation. 

“Somebody has to stand up and yell, ‘The emperor has no clothes!’ and everybody’s falling into lockstep on this,” Mr. Paul said. He confirmed that if the debt limit provision was stripped from the bill, he would “consider” voting for the legislation, though he also made it clear that he would not enjoy doing so if he got to that point.  

“Conservatives do need to stand up and have their voice heard. This is a problem we’ve been facing for decades now, and if we don’t stand up on it, I really fear the direction the country is going,” he added. Several other Republicans have said the spending cuts and reforms to Medicaid have already gone too far in the House version of the bill. Senators Murkowski, Collins, and Moran have all said their states rely heavily on Medicaid for rural health programs and hospitals which must be protected. Senator Hawley calls any effort to cut Medicaid “morally wrong and politically suicidal.”

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device