Why Duolingo isn't helping you learn a foreign language | The Spectator


This article argues that Duolingo, despite its popularity, is an inefficient method for learning a foreign language, suggesting alternative approaches.
AI Summary available — skim the key points instantly. Show AI Generated Summary
Show AI Generated Summary

Duolingo claims that it is ā€˜the world’s best way to learn a language’. The app – which has tens of millions of users – boasts a ā€˜science-backed approach’ that it says ā€˜delivers measurable results’. I’m not convinced: it seems to me that time wasted on Duolingo would be far better spent doing almost anything else.

Busy people, of course, can’t be expected to learn languages the most efficient way: dropping everything to spend some time in a foreign country and learn by immersion. But flickingĀ through one of those kitsch phrasebooks, or listening to a podcast in another language, slowed down to 0.5x speed if necessary, is probably more likely to help your language skills, in a way that is better tailored to your abilities and interests, than five minutes a day on Duolingo.

Millions have been taken in by Duolingo and its marketing gimmicks

Yet millions have been taken in by Duolingo and its marketing gimmicks.

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!