Kadyan B, Sabale V, Mane D, Satav V, Mulay A, Thakur N et al (2016) Large proximal ureteral stones: ideal treatment modality? Urol Ann 8:189–192. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.157963

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Muslumanoglu AY, Karadag MA, Tefekli AH, Altunrende F, Tok A, Berberoglu Y (2006) When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? Int J Urol 13:1385–1388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01585.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, Zhou Z, Xia A, Dai H, Guo L, Zheng J (2013) Clinical observation of different minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi. Pak J Med Sci 29:1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.296.3910

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K (2020) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology; https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/#3

Kesler SS, Pierre SA, Brison DI, Preminger GM, Munver R (2008) Use of the escape nitinol stone retrieval basket facilitates fragmentation and extraction of ureteral and renal calculi: a pilot study. J Endourol 22(6):1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0070

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elashry OM, Tawfik AM (2012) Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 9(12):691–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.204

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chow GK, Patterson DE, Blute ML (2003) Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol 170:99–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000070883.44091.24

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elgebaly O, Abdeldayem H, Idris F, Elrifai A, Fahmy A (2020) Antegrade mini-percutaneous flexible ureteroscopy versus retrograde ureteroscopy for treating impacted proximal ureteric stones of 1–2 cm: a prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol 18(3):176–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1769385

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Preminger GM, Tiselius H-G, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178(6):2418–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 178(4):1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.132

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mousavi Bahar SH, Amirhassani S, Nouralizadeh A, ZerafatJou N, Rasiuli J (2019) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Laparoscopy in the management of large proximal Ureteral stones: the experience of two different settings. Urol J 21:448–452. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4538

Article  Google Scholar 

Güler Y, Erbin A (2021) Comparative evaluation of retrograde intrarenal surgery, antegrade ureterorenoscopy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. Cent Eur J Urol 74(1):57–59. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.0174.R1

Article  Google Scholar 

Mohey A, Abdelfattah AA, Mohammed AE, Marzouk A, El-Dakhakhny AS et al (2023) Comparative study between antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and reterograde intrarenal surgery in the management of impacted upper ureteric stones 1.5 cm or larger. World J Urol 41:3731–3736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04672-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, Meng J (2017) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol 17(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bhaskar K, Somani M, Desai O, Traxer S Lahme (2014) Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis Apr 42(2):95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0630-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SMMH, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, Antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22(12):2677–2680. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0095

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, Seery S, Hu M, Wang M et al (2020) Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (> 10 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 80:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Knoll T, Sarica K, Papatsoris A, Somani BK et al (2017) Minimally invasive surgical ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteric stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur Urol Focus 3:554–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharma G, Pareek T, Tyagi S, Kaundal P, Yadav AK, Thummala Y et al (2021) Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11811. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3

Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z (2020) Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥ 10 mm: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 46(6):902–926. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar