Финансовият министър на САЩ: Кристалина Георгиева трябва да спечели доверието на Тръмп | Дневник

Key Criticisms of IMF and World Bank

US Treasury Secretary, Scott Besant, sharply criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank for deviating from their core missions. He expressed concerns about their focus on climate change, social issues, and gender equality, arguing these are not their primary mandates. He also accused the IMF of being too lenient towards China and not holding it accountable for its economic practices.

Concerns about Funding and Leadership

Besant questioned the continuation of a $4 billion commitment to the World Bank's fund for the poorest countries, highlighting a need for improved focus on development outcomes. He emphasized that IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva and World Bank President Ajay Banga, while considered good leaders, must earn the Trump administration's confidence by refocusing their institutions.

IMF's Response and Future Outlook

Georgieva responded that the IMF is reviewing its loan programs and focusing on structural reforms that emphasize private sector growth. The US Secretary’s criticisms reflect a broader effort by the Trump administration to challenge the progressive ideology within federal institutions. While not advocating complete withdrawal, the US is pushing for significant changes in these institutions’ direction and priorities.

Specific Points of Contention

• The IMF's approach to China: Besant believes the IMF is too optimistic about global economic imbalances and too lenient towards China.
• The World Bank's funding: The US administration is hesitant to continue funding without demonstrating tangible results and a return to core missions.
• The IMF's focus on non-core issues: The focus on social and climate issues is seen as a distraction from the core mission of financial stability.
• China's status as a developing country: The US argues China should no longer be treated as a developing nation given its economic size.