This article analyzes the differences between the Lava Jato case against former President Fernando Collor de Mello and other cases, particularly that of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A key distinction highlighted is the weight of evidence. In Collor's case, the conviction heavily relied on concrete proof of money laundering and deposits—material evidence of the crime. This contrasts with Lula's case, where the perception of a political agenda played a significant role.
The article emphasizes that in Collor's case, the weight given to testimonies from informants was minimal. The core of the conviction rested on strong physical evidence, leading to the exhaustion of legal appeals and eventual imprisonment.
In contrast, Lula's case is presented as having a clear political dimension that influenced its proceedings, thereby differentiating it from Collor's case.