The article centers on the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a US resident unlawfully deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration. Democrats are divided on how to respond: some argue for highlighting the human rights violation, while others fear it elevates Trump's favored issue of immigration.
Critics argue that focusing on immigration, even in a case like Abrego Garcia's, plays into Trump's strengths, distracting from his unpopular economic policies. They believe this approach reinforces the narrative that Democrats prioritize immigrants over American citizens' economic concerns. Republican strategists are using this visit to attack Democrats, further highlighting the perceived political risk.
Conversely, supporters claim that defending due process is a moral imperative and that ignoring the case would embolden Trump. They argue that actions taken, like Sen. Van Hollen's visit, could deter further abuses in El Salvador, offer comfort to Abrego Garcia, and potentially limit Trump's actions. Polls show public disapproval of Trump’s actions in this case.
The article weighs the political costs and benefits. While acknowledging the importance of focusing on economic issues, it argues the potential political damage from advocating for due process is minimal, especially considering public opinion. It concludes by urging Democrats to match their energy in addressing Abrego Garcia's case with similar efforts to highlight Trump's economic failures.