The article details the growing threats to academic freedom in the US, focusing on political interference in universities' decisions. Examples include President Trump's executive order targeting DEI initiatives, Congressional hearings on pro-Palestinian protests, and the Department of Education's actions against Columbia University.
The Supreme Court's previous rulings on academic freedom, such as the Sweezy and Keyishian cases, are contrasted with the current political climate. The article notes the polarization of the issue and how this may impact future Supreme Court decisions.
The heavy reliance of universities on federal funding is highlighted as a significant vulnerability. Columbia University's decision to comply with the Department of Education's demands, despite their likely illegality, exemplifies this vulnerability.
The article reviews two books on academic freedom: Academic Freedom: From Professional Norm to First Amendment Right by David Rabban and You Can’t Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms by Keith Whittington. Both books emphasize the principle that politicians should not interfere with academic decisions.
The article distinguishes between internal academic disputes (between professors, students, and universities) and external threats from politicians. It points out that while the former involve different considerations, the latter directly challenge the core principle of academic freedom.
The Florida Stop WOKE Act serves as a case study, illustrating how legislation can attempt to control what professors can teach. The article argues that this Act directly violates academic freedom.
The article concludes by emphasizing that while academic freedom is not absolute, it is crucial for the pursuit of knowledge and education. It suggests that universities must both defend and deserve academic freedom by fostering diverse viewpoints and engaging with society more effectively.