Frustration with city services in St. Louis has led to a proposal to introduce a city manager, a model used by many American cities with populations exceeding 100,000. This would mark a significant shift from the city's long-standing tradition of mayoral control over administration.
The proposal has sparked debate between Aldermanic President Megan Green and Mayor Cara Spencer, who hold differing views on power distribution. Green advocates for significant aldermanic involvement in the hiring and firing of the city manager, whereas Spencer prioritizes attracting top talent without political interference.
The concept of a city manager was first introduced in Dayton, Ohio, in 1914 and subsequently adopted by many cities. In St. Louis, the idea has been proposed before but failed. Current renewed support comes amidst concerns about the city's declining services and increasing interest in charter reform. Supporters believe a city manager can address the bureaucratic challenges faced by the current system.
Concerns include the potential for high salary costs associated with a city manager and the practical difficulty of achieving political neutrality in the appointment process. Further debates involve the necessary changes to the city's charter. Any charter changes would need approval from at least 60% of voters.
Legislation is nearly complete, with the city manager's role encompassing various city functions. The mayor would nominate a candidate, and aldermanic approval is required. The proposed timeline aims to have this system in place by 2027, contingent on voter approval of necessary charter amendments.