The article contends that focusing on China's use of Uyghur forced labor is a more effective strategy than Trump's trade war approach. It argues that this approach aligns with international human rights laws and offers a broader appeal beyond the contentious trade disputes.
The piece details the severe human rights abuses faced by Uyghurs in Xinjiang, including mass detention, forced labor in various industries (cotton, tomatoes, aluminum, polysilicon), and forced birth control. It cites reports indicating millions of Uyghurs are affected and that the situation constitutes crimes against humanity and genocide.
The article highlights how forced labor provides Chinese businesses an unfair competitive advantage, undercutting prices and harming global markets. It specifically points out the impact on industries such as cotton, tomato paste, aluminum, and polysilicon, with significant global implications.
The author suggests several solutions, including:
The article criticizes Trump's apparent indifference to Uyghur human rights abuses, contrasting his approach with the stronger stance taken by the subsequent administration. It concludes that a focus on forced labor would simultaneously address human rights violations and provide a more effective approach to managing the trade deficit with China.