David Rieff's Desire and Fate provides a critical analysis of the 'woke' movement, arguing that its pursuit of ideals has resulted in unforeseen negative consequences. The book examines how the focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has been manipulated by both sides of the political spectrum, leading to a radical social transformation under the guise of progressive ideals.
A central theme is the paradoxical relationship between desire and fate, illustrated by how the pursuit of individual expression can lead to homogenization and a simulated freedom. Rieff uses examples from literature, such as Oedipus and King Lear, to highlight how idealistic aims can be thwarted by unintended consequences. He argues that the 'woke' ideal of radical social transformation has unintentionally strengthened the status quo.
Rieff criticizes America's 'therapeutic culture,' arguing that it prioritizes psychological well-being over material concerns. He observes a disproportionate focus on symbolic gestures (renaming buildings, removing monuments) compared to addressing tangible problems like healthcare access and economic inequality. He connects this to his father's concept of the 'triumph of the therapeutic,' where psychological concerns overshadow material realities and social justice.
While rejecting the binary nature of 'systemic racism,' Rieff acknowledges the historical and ongoing injustices experienced by marginalized groups. He supports the reparations movement but criticizes the 'woke' approach as prioritizing symbolic change over tangible improvements.
Rieff concludes that fate will ultimately prevail, and that current social and political trends are leading to an era of anxiety and moral panic. He calls for a more realistic and nuanced approach, urging a return to truth and a recognition of human complexity. His work serves as a critical examination of the shortcomings of idealistic pursuits and a call for a more effective means of achieving social justice.