Defence review labelled a ‘damp squib’ after big decisions delayed

See original article

Delayed Decisions in UK Defence Review

The UK's Strategic Defence Review (SDR), led by Lord Robertson and Sir Richard Barrons, is facing criticism for delaying crucial procurement decisions until the autumn. The review, expected to be published soon, is described as lacking specific details and costings, with some calling it a 'damp squib'.

Concerns and Criticisms

Sources within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) claim the SDR will be published without specific details or numbers attached. This echoes comments made by the MoD's permanent secretary, David Williams, who stated that specific investment decisions will be made later. Opposition figures, such as shadow defense secretary James Cartlidge, express concerns that the delay is letting down the armed forces and defense industry and that the government is not showing urgency in rearmament.

Context and Timing

The SDR's publication may coincide with a defense and security partnership agreement with the EU. The review comes amidst a challenging time for the military, following the suspension of the Royal Navy's head, Admiral Sir Ben Key, over misconduct allegations. The review's process has reportedly been fraught with tension and significant changes to its original blueprint.

Key Points

  • Delayed procurement decisions until autumn.
  • Lack of specific details and costings in initial publication.
  • Criticism from opposition figures and concerns about preparedness.
  • Publication possibly linked to EU agreement.
  • Challenges within the military leadership.
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features