Defensa de la soberanía con estrategia | La Prensa Panamá

Key Arguments

The article addresses controversies surrounding a joint statement between Panama and the US Department of Defense, focusing on the omission of a phrase affirming Panamanian sovereignty over the Panama Canal in the English version. The author, Panama's Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, argues that the absence of this phrase in the US version does not negate Panamanian sovereignty, as the statement is not legally binding and the US has consistently acknowledged Panama's sovereignty.

The author also addresses concerns about the "First and Free" phrase used by US officials regarding the transit of warships through the Canal. They explain that "First" refers to preferential treatment for US vessels, as established by the Neutrality Treaty, while "Free" relates to established mechanisms of compensation between states.

Main Points

• Panamanian sovereignty over the Canal is not contingent on its mention in every document, as it is legally and internationally recognized.
• The US has repeatedly affirmed its respect for Panama's sovereignty and the Neutrality Treaty.
• Focusing on semantic differences rather than strategic relations undermines Panama's diplomatic efforts.
• The author advocates for a mature, results-oriented foreign policy that balances principles with pragmatism.

Conclusion

The article concludes by emphasizing that Panama's sovereignty is secure and that it's important to manage relationships strategically, choosing battles wisely and focusing on actions and results rather than reacting to symbolic gestures.