This article argues that a subtle return of socialist ideas is occurring in Western democracies, characterized by growing state intervention in the economy and increased wealth redistribution. This isn't a complete nationalization of industries, but rather a prioritization of equality over individual liberties.
The author points to examples like German politician Jan van Aken's proposal to abolish homework, highlighting a broader attack on the merit principle. The argument is that if some children have advantages, others must be held back, demonstrating a push for equality over achievement.
The article suggests that the atrocities of past socialist states, like those under Stalin and Mao, are being forgotten, allowing the idealistic promises of socialism to overshadow its grim realities. This, combined with a popular cultural romanticization of socialism, contributes to its resurgence.
A key argument is that many people, particularly young people, misunderstand the concept of freedom. They associate it with self-realization rather than the absence of coercion and responsibility for one's actions. This leads to a desire for state intervention and a rejection of the responsibilities that come with true freedom.
The article notes the steady rise of state spending in many Western countries, exceeding levels previously identified as the threshold between capitalism and socialism. This interventionism isn't limited to leftist parties; it is also practiced by centrist and right-wing politicians.
The author draws upon Friedrich Hayek's work to explain this phenomenon, arguing that liberalism's success leads to increased demands and state intervention to address perceived inequalities, even within prosperous societies. This creates a cycle of intervention, where inefficient policies lead to further intervention, as exemplified in German energy policy.
Increased state intervention, the article claims, ultimately endangers freedom of speech. When the state controls the economy, criticism is seen as sabotage, leading to suppression of dissent. This is seen in the way that state-funded organizations react to critical viewpoints.
The conclusion is that socialism's return is not through revolution but through a gradual, insidious expansion of state power under the guise of freedom. This is facilitated by a misunderstanding of freedom, a romanticized view of socialism, and a willingness to sacrifice individual liberty for the perceived collective good.