Bill 5, introduced by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, aims to reduce "red tape" and boost economic growth. However, critics argue it significantly weakens environmental protections, particularly for endangered species. The bill replaces the Endangered Species Act with the Species Conservation Act, which critics say lacks crucial protections.
The new act drastically narrows the definition of "habitat," potentially leaving many species vulnerable. Experts warn of an "invisible slaughterfest" as species lose legal safeguards. The bill also reduces the power of enforcement officers to halt damaging projects.
The government justifies the changes as necessary to address economic uncertainty and stimulate job creation. However, critics contend that environmental protection and economic growth are not mutually exclusive and that this approach is outdated and harmful.
The bill has faced strong opposition from environmental groups, Indigenous leaders, and political parties such as the Green Party and NDP. Concerns are raised about the lack of transparency and public consultation, and the potential erosion of democratic processes.
Bill 5 is seen as part of a pattern of controversial environmental decisions by the Ford government, including changes to conservation authority powers and the now-reversed plan to develop parts of the Greenbelt. These actions have sparked investigations and public outrage.
The bill grants extensive power to the cabinet to exempt projects from environmental regulations, raising concerns about potential abuse and lack of accountability. This is referred to as a "Henry VIII clause" due to the wide-reaching powers it grants the executive branch.
The widespread criticism centers around the perceived prioritization of economic interests over environmental protection, the potential for irreparable damage to ecosystems, and the erosion of democratic processes and public accountability.