The article argues that the Nagpur riots were not spontaneous but orchestrated by vested interests using Aurangzeb's legacy as a political tool to distract from pressing socio-economic issues in Maharashtra.
The author points to several pieces of evidence:
The article suggests that the government's focus on divisive narratives rather than addressing socio-economic challenges is a significant factor contributing to the unrest.
The author concludes that Maharashtra's government must shift its focus from divisive narratives to socio-economic challenges and that civil society must resist communal forces exploiting historical figures for political gains.