The article argues that elections have significant consequences for the media landscape. It uses the example of Barack Obama's presidency, where the Democratic control of government led to a largely pro-Democrat media. This contrasts with the current administration, where a shift towards non-traditional media outlets is occurring, driven by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's efforts to challenge the establishment.
The author criticizes legacy media outlets and the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) for perceived bias in favor of the Democratic party and for not holding previous administrations accountable for issues like Hunter Biden's laptop and the origins of COVID-19. Specific examples of misleading statements by Jen Psaki, former White House Press Secretary, are presented as evidence.
The selection of Amber Ruffin as the Master of Ceremonies for the White House Correspondents' Dinner is heavily criticized. The author points out Ruffin's outspoken anti-Trump sentiments and argues that this selection underscores the bias within the WHCA. The absence of both Donald Trump and Karoline Leavitt from the dinner is also highlighted.
The piece notes the declining public trust in the media, dropping from 74% of independent voters trusting the media in 1976 to 27% today. This is linked to perceived partisan bias and lack of accountability.
The author concludes that the shifts in media access and the controversies surrounding the WHCA are ultimately positive developments if the press aims to regain integrity and broader representation. Increased diversity in voices and questions during press briefings are presented as potential benefits.