Elon Musk's involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Trump administration is scrutinized. While he plans to reduce his time commitment from May, he also suggests continued involvement until 2029, despite legal questions surrounding his role as a 'special government employee'.
Musk's extensive authority within DOGE, exceeding what's typical for a special government employee, is criticized. Experts argue that his influence on matters directly impacting his financial interests is inappropriate. His role has been criticized for a lack of transparency and its potential for financial waste. The article also questions whether Musk's role complies with the 130-day service limit for special government employees.
The article highlights potential conflicts of interest stemming from Musk's multiple businesses and his government role. It raises concerns about the administration's seeming willingness to circumvent regulations to retain Musk's advice. Despite Trump's statement about secretaries taking over DOGE once Musk leaves, the lack of transparency in the organization raises questions about its future.
The White House declined comment, and the article concludes by noting the irony of the administration’s flexibility given their efforts to decrease flexibility in the federal workforce.