Fumata blanca entre Zelenski y Trump: un acuerdo absurdo porque los propios EEUU admiten que Ucrania no tiene tierras raras | Internacional

See original article

Key Points of the US-Ukraine Mineral Deal

The article details a tentative agreement between the US and Ukraine for joint exploitation of Ukrainian minerals, primarily focusing on the improbable claim of significant rare earth reserves. The deal, negotiated after a failed attempt in February, is spearheaded by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko.

Doubtful Rare Earth Reserves

The agreement’s foundation, largely based on former President Trump’s assertion of half a trillion dollars worth of rare earths in Ukraine, is heavily contested. Authoritative sources, such as the US Geological Survey (USGS), find no evidence to support this claim. The available data suggests that any potential rare earth presence is based on outdated Soviet-era analyses and lacks confirmation of commercially viable quantities.

  • USGS reports show no confirmation of significant rare earth reserves in Ukraine.
  • Existing reports are based on outdated Soviet-era data.

The global rare earth market is significantly smaller than Trump's claim suggests, with China dominating production.

Other Strategic Minerals

While the rare earth claim is questionable, Ukraine possesses reserves of other strategic minerals, including grafite (6% of global reserves, placing it in the lead in Europe), lithium, and some gas and oil reserves. However, these are also relatively limited compared to global giants such as Australia, Brazil, and China.

Challenges and Uncertainties

Several factors hinder the viability of the deal. These include:

  • War in Ukraine: A significant portion of Ukrainian mineral reserves may be in Russian-occupied territories.
  • Infrastructure damage: Damage to Ukrainian infrastructure further complicates mining operations.
  • Bureaucracy and Corruption: Ukraine's historical issues with bureaucracy and corruption pose risks to foreign investments.

The absence of significant interest from mining companies and the potential for non-US entities to benefit from the deal underline the deal's uncertainties and question its practical success. The article concludes with a note of concern over the agreement, highlighting the questionable claims of rare earth reserves and the significant obstacles to its implementation.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features