The article discusses the significant social movement in Panama in 2023 against the copper mine, highlighting the various underlying causes beyond environmental concerns, including frustration with government corruption and the mining contract itself. The abrupt closure of the mine negatively impacted the national economy and local communities.
The Supreme Court's declaration of the mining contract as unconstitutional is mentioned, questioning Panama's legal security. The author suggests that solely focusing on environmental factors is insufficient when deciding on the mine's reopening.
The article proposes two options: reopening the mine with a new, more beneficial contract for Panama and stricter environmental monitoring or reopening for a limited time to ensure proper environmental closure. A recent anti-mining vigil had significantly lower attendance than in 2023, possibly due to improved understanding of the mine's potential economic benefits.
The author emphasizes the need for unbiased analysis of all factors, hoping the government makes the best decision for the country's future. The conclusion advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes economic development while minimizing environmental harm.