Harvard rejects Trump demands on diversity and protesters

See original article

Harvard's Defiance

Harvard University rejected President Trump's ultimatum to curtail diversity programs and student protests, even with the risk of losing nearly $9 billion in federal funding. This decision contrasts sharply with Columbia University's approach of seeking accommodation.

Trump's Demands

The White House issued a list of demands, including restrictions on foreign student admissions, third-party oversight of departments, and new rules to control student protests. The demands also targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, which the administration sought to eliminate.

Harvard's Response

Harvard President Alan Garber declared that the university would not compromise its independence or constitutional rights. He denounced the demands as an unlawful attempt to control teaching and learning at the institution. Harvard professors also filed a lawsuit to prevent funding cuts.

Comparison with Columbia

Columbia University, unlike Harvard, agreed to several demands from the Trump administration, including a ban on masks at protests and increased campus security. This decision came after the administration cancelled $400 million in federal grants.

Context

The Trump administration's actions reflect a broader effort to combat what it terms “woke” ideology and alleged antisemitism in universities across the nation.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features