The article highlights the growing technological dominance of autocratic states, particularly China, and the lack of coordinated response from democracies. It emphasizes that whoever shapes the use of emerging technologies will hold a significant advantage.
China's strategic use of technology, particularly in areas such as AI and 5G, is presented as a major concern. The example of China's involvement in Zimbabwe's national facial recognition system is cited as a demonstration of how autocracies are using technology for political control.
In contrast, the article criticizes the United States and its allies for their fragmented and reactive responses to autocratic actions, illustrated by inconsistent approaches to Huawei's 5G capabilities and Russian election meddling.
As a solution, the article proposes the formation of a 'T-12' group of techno-democracies—a coalition of 12 technologically advanced democracies—to coordinate their technological strategies.
The article emphasizes that the T-12 should be an informal group, similar to the G-7, focusing on coordination rather than formal agreements.
The article suggests various areas of potential collaboration for the T-12:
The article anticipates objections to the T-12, including general opposition to new international groupings and concerns about private sector involvement and potential reactions from China and Russia. However, it argues that the benefits of cooperation among democracies outweigh these concerns.
The article concludes by drawing a parallel between the T-12 and the Bretton Woods conference, emphasizing the urgency for democracies to recognize that technology is too important to be left to individual nations or technologists alone.