It’s a Wonder Anyone Supports Trump at All With This Level of Negative Coverage – PJ Media

Main Argument

The article's central claim is that major US networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) present overwhelmingly negative coverage of Donald Trump's second presidential term, amounting to a form of propaganda influencing public opinion. It cites a Media Research Center report indicating 92% negative coverage in the first 100 days.

Supporting Evidence

The article supports this claim with statistics: 92% negative coverage of Trump's administration, 93% negative coverage of his tariffs and immigration policies, and near-unanimous negative coverage of key administration members. It contrasts this with purportedly more favorable coverage of Joe Biden during his presidency.

• 92% negative coverage of Trump's administration overall.
• 93% negative coverage of Trump's tariffs and immigration policies.
• Nearly 100% negative coverage of key administration figures (Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Elon Musk, Pete Hegseth).
• Only 3.5 minutes out of nearly 4 hours of airtime dedicated to showcasing the success of Trump's border security efforts.

The article also uses the Dan Rather controversy from 2004 as a historical example of media bias against George W. Bush to illustrate a pattern of dishonesty in election-related reporting.

Conclusion

The article concludes by calling on viewers to recognize the alleged bias and stop watching network news, urging them to question the information they receive.