The article begins by acknowledging past US military interventions in Mexico, highlighting that such actions are not unprecedented. It distinguishes between past large-scale conflicts and more recent, subtle interventions, including the 'Rápido y Furioso' operation and the use of drones.
The author criticizes the US's double standard in its foreign policy, citing its interventions in democratically elected governments to further its interests. The article references Eduardo Galeano's 'Open Veins of Latin America' to illustrate this point.
The article analyzes Donald Trump's potential for military intervention, characterizing his approach as unpredictable and driven by self-interest. The designation of Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations and the possibility of military action to combat fentanyl trafficking are discussed.
The potential for a US military intervention is assessed, exploring its impact on Mexico's political landscape and the possible unintended consequences. It suggests that such action could lead to a surge in Mexican nationalism and inadvertently elevate the cartels' status in popular culture. The author emphasizes the potential for the escalation of conflict and detrimental effects for both nations.
The article concludes by stressing that while a US military intervention isn't impossible, it would likely be met with almost unanimous disapproval in Mexico, resulting in significant losses for all parties involved.