The article centers on the concept of 'patrimonialism' to explain Donald Trump's actions as president. It contrasts this model with the procedural bureaucracy of modern states, highlighting how Trump's appointments and policies prioritize personal loyalty over institutional norms and merit.
The author contrasts two models of governance: patrimonialism, where legitimacy stems from personal ties to the leader, and procedural bureaucracy, where legitimacy comes from institutions and adherence to rules. The analysis argues that Trump embodies patrimonialism, rewarding loyalty with appointments, irrespective of experience or merit.
These examples, the article argues, showcase how Trump utilizes his power to benefit those loyal to him, undermining traditional bureaucratic processes and democratic norms. This approach extends to foreign policy, exemplified by the handling of negotiations with Ukraine, which are described as transactional and lacking in adherence to established international protocols.
The article concludes by highlighting the broader implications of Trump's patrimonialist governance, specifically the erosion of traditional democratic institutions and the disruption of international relations. It suggests that his actions have far-reaching effects, challenging established global order and weakening the role of international organizations. A bipartisan attempt to rein in the president's authority through Congressional action is also mentioned, suggesting ongoing efforts to counter Trump's approach.