Laurence Tribe, God, and the Roberts Court | The New York Sun

See original article

Shifting Perspectives on the Supreme Court

The article analyzes the changing viewpoints of legal commentators Laurence Tribe and Ruth Marcus regarding the US Supreme Court. Initially critical of the court, especially concerning rulings related to Donald Trump, they now express gratitude for recent decisions.

Ruth Marcus's Evolving Stance

Ruth Marcus, previously highly critical of the Supreme Court, now praises its actions, specifically its intervention in halting deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. This marks a stark contrast to her earlier opinions, which included a column titled "God Save Us From This Dishonorable Court."

Laurence Tribe's Change of Heart

Laurence Tribe, similarly, has shifted his perspective. While previously accusing the court of exceeding its authority under Trump's administration, he now expresses appreciation for its role in checking Trump's actions. This change is highlighted by his contrasting statements, from calling Trump a "betrayal of the Constitution" to expressing gratitude toward the court.

The Supreme Court's Actions

The article points to the Supreme Court's recent rulings, particularly those involving immigration policies under the Trump administration, as the impetus for this altered viewpoint. It mentions how Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice Roberts have played significant roles in these decisions, occasionally forming an alliance that has resulted in setbacks for Trump's agenda.

Underlying Themes

  • The fluidity of political opinions.
  • The Supreme Court's role in upholding the rule of law.
  • The complexities of judging the legitimacy of court decisions.
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features