The report acknowledges historical injustices against the Mapuche people, including land dispossession by the Chilean state. It proposes a series of measures for reparations, including land restitution and addressing violence in the Araucanía region. These measures have long-term execution periods, spanning decades. The aim is to resolve the conflict while maintaining productive land use and strengthening property rights.
The report's release coincides with a challenging political climate following the failed Constitutional Convention, and ongoing violence in the Araucanía region. Critics, particularly from the right, view the report as an 'October-style' document, associating it with the left-wing agenda. Concerns were also raised about the inclusion of non-conflicted groups in the proposed constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples.
Despite the criticism, some, like Jorge Andrés Luchsinger, whose parents were victims of terrorism, consider the report's long-term approach as crucial for Araucanía's recovery. The author concludes that the report's merits outweigh its flaws and should be considered carefully by lawmakers, urging for a balanced approach instead of outright rejection.