This article from the New York Times presents the policy positions of prominent candidates in the New Jersey gubernatorial race. The candidates' stances on several key issues are highlighted.
Democratic candidates proposed various strategies to address the affordable housing shortage, including establishing task forces, tax incentives, rent control, and regulations on corporate investors. Republican candidates generally opposed mandated housing construction, preferring a regional approach and local control over zoning.
Democratic candidates largely supported codifying the Immigrant Trust Directive and opposing President Trump's immigration initiatives. Republican candidates generally advocated for working with the federal government to enforce immigration laws and repealing the Immigrant Trust Directive.
Democratic candidates supported reinforcing the law permitting abortion throughout pregnancy, even suggesting constitutional amendments. Republican candidates expressed varying degrees of support for abortion rights, with some supporting restrictions on late-term abortions and taxpayer funding.
Candidates from both parties acknowledged NJ Transit's performance challenges. Democratic candidates proposed solutions such as increased funding, service expansion, and operational improvements. Republican candidates suggested creating a transportation authority and utilizing public-private partnerships.
Democratic candidates generally focused on progressive tax reforms, such as a millionaire's tax and expanding tax credits for low- and middle-income families. Republican candidates emphasized tax cuts for businesses and individuals, as well as measures to control state spending and reduce property taxes.
Democratic candidates supported increasing school funding, addressing learning gaps, improving teacher recruitment and retention, and enhancing mental health services in schools. Republican candidates advocated for school choice, expanding charter schools, and reducing state mandates on schools.
Democratic candidates emphasized investing in clean energy, flood mitigation, and coastal protection. Republican candidates held diverse views, with some opposing offshore wind projects and others supporting alternative energy sources.