NYC union yanks backing for one Council member, pulls cash to others over Medicare Advantage beef

See original article

Key Conflict: Medicare Advantage Plan

The core issue is Mayor Adams' plan to shift NYC's 250,000 municipal retirees to Medicare Advantage, a privatized version of Medicare, aiming for cost savings. This plan is opposed by a group of retirees and some City Council members.

Union Retaliation

DC 37, representing 150,000 active city workers, initially supported the Mayor's plan. However, following Council members' introduction of a bill to maintain traditional Medicare for retirees, DC 37 took action. They rescinded their endorsement of Councilwoman Alexa Aviles and stopped donating to other council members supporting the bill.

Council Bill and its Implications

The Council bill aims to legally mandate the city's provision of a traditional Medicare plan with city subsidies for retirees. DC 37 argues the bill lacks funding and would force active workers to pay higher premiums to subsidize it.

Legal Challenges

The Mayor's Medicare Advantage plan has faced repeated legal setbacks, with the latest appeal heading to the state's highest court.

Further Actions

DC 37's actions highlight the significant influence of unions in local elections and underscore the ongoing conflict between the Mayor's cost-saving efforts and the retirees' desire to retain their traditional Medicare coverage.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features