O erro de Alexandre de Moraes que vai custar muito... | VEJA

See original article

Critique of STF's Action

The article strongly condemns the Supreme Tribunal Federal (STF) for serving Jair Bolsonaro with legal documents in a hospital ICU following surgery. It argues this action was inappropriate and demonstrates poor judgment, especially given the gravity of the ongoing case against Bolsonaro.

Legal and Ethical Concerns

The author points out the conflict with the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits serving legal papers to individuals in critical health conditions. They question the STF's awareness of this code and highlight the unnecessary and potentially harmful nature of the action.

Political Ramifications

The article suggests that the STF's decision plays into Bolsonaro's narrative of victimhood, bolstering support among his base. This outcome, deemed counterproductive by the author, inadvertently strengthens Bolsonaro's position.

STF's Justification and Counterarguments

The STF's justification, referencing Bolsonaro's prior live stream from the hospital, is countered by the article. The author argues that delaying the service until after Bolsonaro's recovery would have avoided this negative outcome, despite a slight delay in legal proceedings.

Comparison to Lula's Case

The author draws a parallel with the rushed nature of Lula's conviction during the Lava Jato operation, suggesting that similar haste in Bolsonaro's case could prove detrimental to the STF.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features