Pierre Poilievre's campaign is criticized for its reliance on past talking points and its failure to adapt to changing circumstances. Internal figures have openly criticized the campaign strategy, comparing it to 'campaign malpractice' and predicting its failure. The article uses the analogy of a band playing only its greatest hits, ignoring new material.
Poilievre's campaign continues to focus on attacking the Liberals and highlighting his past successes. He emphasizes issues such as resource development, tax loopholes, criminal justice reform, and housing costs. His rallies, however, focus on familiar attacks against his opponents, using nicknames and often repetitive slogans.
Poilievre's strategy is met with negative feedback, both publicly and internally. Poll numbers are unfavorably low, and fellow Conservatives are openly expressing their concerns and frustrations with the campaign. This internal strife is highlighted by the example of Kory Teneycke's vocal criticism.
The article argues that Poilievre's continued use of his 'greatest hits' is a strategic mistake. The campaign's inability to evolve and address current concerns is costing him support, and he is urged to consider adjusting his approach before it's too late.