Prince Andrew's supporters gave us access to his private papers to prove his innocence. It backfired on them badly, as RICHARD PENDLEBURY's forensic investigation shows... | Daily Mail Online

Prince Andrew's Failed PR Campaign

This article details an investigative journalist's experience gaining access to Prince Andrew's private papers, supposedly to prove his innocence against Virginia Giuffre's sexual assault allegations. The attempt backfired, revealing more incriminating evidence.

Key Evidence and Discrepancies

• Diary Entries: Conflicting diary entries concerning Andrew's whereabouts on the day of the alleged first encounter with Giuffre in London were uncovered. These entries, intended to create an alibi, instead raised more questions about his schedule.
• New York Trip: The investigation revealed inconsistencies between Andrew's statements about his trip to New York and his actual itinerary, proving he likely spent time at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion.
• Bahamas Trip: Documents and statements highlighted a change in Andrew's travel plans, indicating he prioritized a visit to Epstein's private island over joining his family in the Bahamas.
• Giuffre's Testimony: While acknowledging inconsistencies in Giuffre's accounts, the investigation found her allegations not incompatible with the newly found information.

The article suggests that the documents and access provided by Andrew's team, intended to prove his innocence, instead strengthened Giuffre's claims due to the inconsistencies and newly revealed details.

Conclusion

The journalist concludes that while Giuffre may have been an unreliable witness due to discrepancies in her accounts, the evidence gathered pointed towards the likelihood of Andrew's involvement in sexualized contact with a teenage Giuffre. Andrew's out-of-court settlement with Giuffre further reinforces the allegations, leaving an indelible mark on his reputation.