Refusal to implement the Waqf Act is unconstitutional, untenable: Rijiju - The Hindu

See original article

Key Points

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju stated that refusal to implement the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, is unconstitutional and untenable. This follows some state governments, including Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and West Bengal, opposing or refusing to implement the Act.

Rijiju's Stance

Rijiju, who piloted the Act through Parliament, attributed the opposition to anger, emotions, and political motivations. He warned that those refusing implementation would face consequences, emphasizing the constitutional implications of defying a parliamentary act.

Constitutional Aspects

Land and law and order are state subjects, but parts of the Waqf Act are on the Concurrent List, requiring state government implementation. The central government is framing rules for the Act's implementation.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Rijiju clarified that if states fail to follow the Act, they will face legal consequences, as this violates the constitution. He predicted that Chief Ministers openly defying the act would eventually comply.

Legal Challenges

The Supreme Court is currently hearing legal challenges against the Waqf (Amendment) Act.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features