RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Labour's 'new' migrant policy is just another ludicrous gimmick to divert attention from Starmer's failure... just read the small print | Daily Mail Online

Labour's 'New' Migrant Policy: A Critique

Richard Littlejohn's article in the Daily Mail criticizes Labour's new migrant policy requiring A-level English proficiency. He argues this is a superficial measure to distract from Labour's failure to address the immigration crisis. He uses his own lack of A-level English as an example, highlighting the impracticality of the policy and its inconsistency.

Weaknesses and Inconsistencies

• Littlejohn points out the five-year timeframe for migrants to achieve A-level English fluency is unrealistic, given the questionable effectiveness of English language schools and the unlikelihood of enforcement.
• He highlights the hypocrisy of expecting foreigners to master English when many politicians struggle with clear communication.
• The article also points out that the policy is ineffective against the significant numbers of immigrants already in the UK without adequate English skills.
• The massive cost of interpreter services and benefits provided to immigrants is also emphasized.

Political Implications

Littlejohn contends that this policy is a knee-jerk reaction by Labour, a dishonest attempt to distract from their broader failures regarding immigration. He criticizes the Conservatives' past promises to cut immigration which were not fulfilled. The current Labour's left-leaning stance makes significant changes to immigration policy unlikely, further strengthening Littlejohn's argument.

Overall Assessment

The article concludes that Labour's proposed policy is a flawed and ineffective measure and ultimately serves as a publicity stunt rather than a genuine solution to the immigration challenge faced by the UK.