Sabrina Sin Censura: Chiari, no Noriega | La Prensa Panamá

Key Concerns Regarding US-Panama Agreements

The article centers on public criticism in Panama concerning recent agreements signed with the United States. Concerns are raised about the phrasing in official documents, particularly a joint declaration where Panama seemingly endorses Trump's narrative on China's presence, raising questions about the president's motives.

Points of Contention

• Uncorrected English Version: The English version of the Mulino-Hegseth declaration remains uncorrected, raising concerns about the accuracy and implications of the agreement.
• Shared Use Sites: The Memorandum of Understanding establishes shared use sites with designated zones and installations, which raises concerns about the permanence of these sites and potential violations of the Treaty of Neutrality.
• Canal Proximity: The location of some of these sites near the Panama Canal, coupled with clauses on protecting the canal and adjacent areas, is seen as a potential violation of Article 325 of the Constitution, which requires Assembly approval and a referendum for such agreements.
• Cost-Neutral Treatment: The concept of “cost-neutral” treatment for US warships mentioned in the Icaza-Hegseth declaration is seen as discriminatory and against the essence of the Treaty of Neutrality.

The author argues that the government's handling of the situation has been insufficient, leading to a lack of public trust. The author also contrasts the government's current approach with the actions of former President Roberto F. Chiari who collaborated with the opposition during a similar crisis.