The article criticizes Keir Starmer's perceived passivity in the face of aggressive US trade policies under President Trump. It argues that Starmer's ambiguity is inadequate and that Britain should take a firmer stance against the US, standing with European and other allies instead of seeking preferential treatment.
The author expresses concern over Britain's seeming willingness to appease Trump, referring to it as "kowtowing" rather than showing appropriate firmness. They criticize the government and opposition for avoiding direct criticism of Trump's actions. The author highlights Britain's attempts to secure carve-outs from Trump's tariffs as "shabby."
The piece argues that the phrase "nobody wins from a trade war" is a dangerous justification for inaction. It emphasizes that self-defense and credible threats of retaliation are necessary to deter bullies. The author draws parallels to military strategy, arguing that a willingness to retaliate is essential for maintaining peace.
The article also discusses China's actions, citing examples such as Jingye's exit from British steelworks and the barring of a British MP from Hong Kong as examples of questionable behavior. It suggests that China's actions, alongside Trump's policies, create a complex and challenging international landscape.
Finally, the article cautions against viewing the current situation as a permanent shift in the global order, suggesting that Trump's presidency, while disruptive, might ultimately be a temporary phase with long-term effects.