The article traces the history of isolationism in US foreign policy, highlighting its ideological diversity and appeal across the political spectrum. It emphasizes that this approach, from George Washington's Farewell Address to the America First Committee, had various supporters with different motivations: realists, idealists, conservatives, libertarians, and anti-immigrant groups. The entry of the US into World War II marked a significant turning point, leading to the dominance of liberal internationalism.
Trump's 'America First' policy is presented as a response to the changing world and the electorate's demand for an inward turn. His promises to prioritize domestic issues resonated with those feeling left behind by liberal internationalism. Although his domestic policies have faced criticism, the article suggests his neo-isolationist leanings retain significant public support.
The authors critique Trump's unilateralism, particularly his potential disregard for NATO commitments. However, they acknowledge some merit in his cautious stance towards entanglement and his initiation of the withdrawal from Afghanistan. They argue that a realistic approach should be adopted, recognizing Ukraine's difficult situation and potentially seeking a negotiated settlement.
The article discusses the ideological continuity between Trump's skepticism of nation-building and the historical approach of early America, which favored influence through example. While acknowledging Trump's fondness for autocrats, the article credits his pragmatic readiness to work across ideological lines. It contrasts this with Biden's framing of the current world as a battle between democracy and autocracy.
The authors connect Trump's anti-immigrant stance to past American isolationism and protectionism. They note the historical link between anti-immigrant sentiment and isolationism, exemplified by restrictive immigration legislation in the past. Trump's protectionist policies, including tariffs on Chinese goods, are similarly analyzed within this historical context.
The article concludes by urging Democrats to preempt Trump's 'America First' agenda by embracing its most appealing elements. This involves finding a middle ground between expansive liberal internationalism and dangerous isolationist tendencies. Key recommendations include:
The overarching message is that Democrats must understand and address the concerns that fuel Trump's appeal to avoid the dangers of his possible reelection and safeguard the foundation of a purposeful and sustainable US internationalism.